Safari World Thailand

with unequal weapons. .

S ì, I admit. I rode, and many more. I rode to continue to receive two of spades steeped in hypocrisy and sufficiency .

"Sorry John, the publishing executives do not consider suitable for publication the text of her subject. The fact remains that could be adopted by other publishers. Yours sincerely. "

you mind? Yours sincerely? But who wants it, your kindness? I would like the frankness, sincerity. And 'your job, fuck, you're not social workers or members of the "City Angels"! Write it bluntly, if this book sucks, if it is unprintable, it is impractical, if unpresentable. Only two publishers have been known to be blunt, the Rizzoli and Fazi. The first has a real review, praising some passages of the book, but expressed misgivings on the effective interest that the topic chat and blind dates "could still evoke among the players at present. The second motivated rejection of inappropriate content and speaking style in terms of their necklaces. This is called thinking! The other answers, there where we were, they know hot air pre-packaged. Phrases fact, leaving the time they find. A third publishing house, the iron horse, seemed about to "sell", but then the last word was "No, thank you."

Yes, of course, I rode a lot! I do not want to go cocky, but honestly I expected that some publishing house, maybe a medium-small vessels, did a concrete step closer. For a number of reasons: the subject, the way the text has been developed and, especially, for my experience and therefore optimal to tell the world that is developed around the chat and blind dates. After the interview appeared on the Portal Libero.it (click HERE ) and read by over 171 thousand users, I received almost a hundred emails from part of people interested and intrigued by the book. All people who encouraged me to not give up: of all mail received after the interview, there is none has been only one, I swear, characterized by insult or something. This means everything and nothing, I know, but it is a matter of objective fact. It 'clear evidence of how the topic is more timely than ever. I am angry, and much, because they are published without any problems just because you're the Cumenda of Big Brother, Amanda Knox, or if you Nadiolinda or a Melissa P. any. I do not blame them, either clear. I have it with those who say NO to my " Refrain wasters " and say YES to their books. And, most importantly, it clearly tells me why. Yes, of course, are not required to do so, they receive thousands of texts in vision. But, I repeat, is the profession they have chosen. If a writer is scarce, it is fair that you tell him! So many will probably get over it and the work of editor in a sense would even streamlined. But no, on daily, with the licks of circumstance copiaincolla version, a little 'how "we'll know" after interviews and auditions dall'epilogo already written. Call me delusional but I in a world so hypocritical, I really can not resign, despite everything.