Frida NAČINOVIĆ
Paolo Ferrero, who made you feel the intervention of Vendola? Did you like?
I really shared the description of the Italian crisis viewed as organic crisis of civilization as well as economic and social development. As I shared the goals of transformation that has brought Vendola. In particular, I appreciated his emphasis on the value of work, the need to call the center the dignity of work. On the basic objectives we agree.
what's not convinced you? This
in a bar I was not convinced the way that implicitly Vendola more explicitly proposes to achieve those goals.
Vendola But if he wins the primaries ....
listening to them is that a victory in the primaries would be the sudden possibility of a parliamentary majority outstretched in Italy to build the alternative: no to war, public water, deck Fiom at work ...
But the parties are: the Democratic Party all'Idv, UDC. And there's Confindustria.
How do you accomplish that evoked by Vendola with the ruling Democratic Party or even the UDC? There is a logical gap between the objectives set out - all shareable - and practices to achieve them. An example: the Democratic Party has not acceded to the manifestation of Fiom although there was some managers, the UDC has told African and horns. So when he speaks in accents Vendola good positive work rights, but then, as implementing this policy with this center?
Vendola The impression is that it is not interested in joining what is left of the Democratic Party. He says that we must "deal with all parties of the center, even with the IDV, we need to talk to the comrades of the Federation of the Left, we need to talk to and grillini Grillo." So, all together in one package.
Nor have I heard the report Vendola the theme of unity on the left. It is addressed directly to the center, especially the Democratic Party. I believe instead that the left should be united so that things also shown by Vendola, as well as tell you, you are able to do. To achieve those goals should be to make a strong political struggle, to organize a strong left, a movement to rebuild the country's transformation to mass base. For this is an unavoidable step to continue the social mobilization and the merge left from the content expressed by the expression of the Fiom metalworkers of 16, for public water, no to war in Afghanistan.
And what about the Democratic Party?
should unite all the left, building a movement to fight this urge and from the PD from the content. Should strengthen the field of the left in order to make a political battle effectively. For this I was disappointed not to hear a word against the bipolarity, as if the bipolarity was not used in recent years by Confindustria to continue to control any deployment that had ruled. As if it were not jointly responsible for the bipolarity of the drift and populist plebiscite that corrupts Italian politics today.
Vendola wants to change the center of the center winning the primaries, Ferrero wants to unite the left. They are very different political projects. Irreconcilable?
Again, great harmony on some goals but they are two different political projects. But I continue to think that our people may deem necessary in the unity of the left, that left the country independent from the powers that be that they do more than one surface in contact with the center. So I think we must continue to advance our proposal for a drive on the left, from the lists for local elections. For us, the need for unity is not an option but a decisive change for the country.
Speaking Vendola also rightly looked to the positive experiences that come from Latin America. In Europe there has been talk recently .
I shared much the application of experience in Latin America. Sure it was good to hear some word on the profile of social democracy on the continent. In Europe, the battle is not only against the right, but also against a single thought which unites more often center-right and center when deciding on specific policies.
free (23/10/2010)
listening to them is that a victory in the primaries would be the sudden possibility of a parliamentary majority outstretched in Italy to build the alternative: no to war, public water, deck Fiom at work ...
But the parties are: the Democratic Party all'Idv, UDC. And there's Confindustria.
How do you accomplish that evoked by Vendola with the ruling Democratic Party or even the UDC? There is a logical gap between the objectives set out - all shareable - and practices to achieve them. An example: the Democratic Party has not acceded to the manifestation of Fiom although there was some managers, the UDC has told African and horns. So when he speaks in accents Vendola good positive work rights, but then, as implementing this policy with this center?
Vendola The impression is that it is not interested in joining what is left of the Democratic Party. He says that we must "deal with all parties of the center, even with the IDV, we need to talk to the comrades of the Federation of the Left, we need to talk to and grillini Grillo." So, all together in one package.
Nor have I heard the report Vendola the theme of unity on the left. It is addressed directly to the center, especially the Democratic Party. I believe instead that the left should be united so that things also shown by Vendola, as well as tell you, you are able to do. To achieve those goals should be to make a strong political struggle, to organize a strong left, a movement to rebuild the country's transformation to mass base. For this is an unavoidable step to continue the social mobilization and the merge left from the content expressed by the expression of the Fiom metalworkers of 16, for public water, no to war in Afghanistan.
And what about the Democratic Party?
should unite all the left, building a movement to fight this urge and from the PD from the content. Should strengthen the field of the left in order to make a political battle effectively. For this I was disappointed not to hear a word against the bipolarity, as if the bipolarity was not used in recent years by Confindustria to continue to control any deployment that had ruled. As if it were not jointly responsible for the bipolarity of the drift and populist plebiscite that corrupts Italian politics today.
Vendola wants to change the center of the center winning the primaries, Ferrero wants to unite the left. They are very different political projects. Irreconcilable?
Again, great harmony on some goals but they are two different political projects. But I continue to think that our people may deem necessary in the unity of the left, that left the country independent from the powers that be that they do more than one surface in contact with the center. So I think we must continue to advance our proposal for a drive on the left, from the lists for local elections. For us, the need for unity is not an option but a decisive change for the country.
Speaking Vendola also rightly looked to the positive experiences that come from Latin America. In Europe there has been talk recently .
I shared much the application of experience in Latin America. Sure it was good to hear some word on the profile of social democracy on the continent. In Europe, the battle is not only against the right, but also against a single thought which unites more often center-right and center when deciding on specific policies.
free (23/10/2010)
0 comments:
Post a Comment